Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UTAPP 83 - Elman v. Elman

Elman v. Elman’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 2020

21 state decisions

130200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 77 Ohio St. 3d 64 - State ex rel. Miley v. Parrott · Burt v. Burt · Noble v. Noble · Dunn v. Dunn · Mortensen v. Mortensen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'A trial court has considerable discretion concerning property [division] in a divorce proceeding, thus its actions enjoy a presumption of validity.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'A trial court has considerable discretion concerning property [division] in a divorce proceeding, thus its actions enjoy a presumption of validity.' " (alteration in original) (citation omitted)). "We disturb a trial court's property division and valuation 'only when there is a misunderstanding or misapplication of the law resulting in substantial and prejudicial error, the evidence clearly preponderates against the findings, or such a serious inequity has resulted as to manifest a clear abuse of discretion.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[Sleparate property is not totally beyond [a] court's reach in an equitable property division. The court may award the separate property of one spouse to the other spouse in extraordinary situations where equity so demands.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.