Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UTAPP 9 - State v. Chavez

State v. Chavez’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Alford v. United States · United States v. Bernal-Obeso · State v. Kruger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing a trial court's decision to limit cross-examination, we review the legal rule applied for correctness and the application of the rule to the facts of the case for an abuse of discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If an error does occur, we must determine whether ... the error was nonetheless 'harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “) 3 Accordingly, upon a showing of Confrontation Clause error, reversal is required unless a reviewing court determines that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. T12 Assuming without deciding that the trial court erred by refusing to recall J.B. to the stand, we turn to the second part of this test.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.