Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WI 101 - State v. Watkins

State v. Watkins’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. (2005), 2001 WI App 73 - Reget v. Paige (2001)

59 state decisions

380200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. New York · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · Vollmer v. Luety · 124 Wis. 2d 681 - State v. Wyss · 53 Wis. 2d 218 - Bautista v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'a defendant's assertion raising new facts and arguments that, if true, will defeat the plaintiff's or prosecution's claim even if all allegations in the complaint are true.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “a reviewing court may overturn a verdict on grounds of insufficiency of the evidence only if the trier of fact could not possibly have drawn the appropriate inferences from the evidence adduced at trial to find the requisite guilt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “'is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.