Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2002 WI 110

State v. Veach

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2002

Wisconsin Supreme Court · decided 2002-07-16

Relies on Old Chief v. United States · 214 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Alexander · 203 Wis. 2d 158 - State v. Wallerman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-07-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably State v. Franklin (2004), State v. Payano (2009)

26 state decisions

220200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

N. PATRICK CROOKS, J.

¶1¶ 137. (concurring). I agree with the majority's decision. I write separately, however, because I would explicitly overrule State v. Wallerman, 203 Wis. 2d 158, 552 N.W.2d 128 (Ct. App. 1996), and State v. DeKeyser, 221 Wis. 2d 435, 585 N.W.2d 668 (Ct. App. 1998), and rely on Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172 (1997), and State v. Alexander, 214 Wis. 2d 628, 571 N.W.2d 662 (1997). The majority implies that it is overruling Wallermanand DeKeyserat paragraph 118, but it does not do so explicitly. In fact, at paragraph 123, the majority suggests that it is only modifying those cases by stating, "We do not mean to imply that Wallermanstipulations *445are per se invalid, even in child sexual assault cases." I would overrule Wallermanand DeKeyser; thus, I respectfully concur."

¶2¶ 138. I am authorized to state that Justices JON E WILCOX and DIANE S. SYKES join this concurrence.

/2002/wi/110 · .json · Public domain