Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WI 27 - Knight v. Milwaukee County

Knight v. Milwaukee County’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Liebovich v. Minnesota Insurance (2008), Russ Ex Rel. Schwartz v. Russ (2007)

28 state decisions

260200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. Oklahoma · 26 Cal. 4th 519 - Conservatorship of Wendland · Doe v. Gallinot · 122 Wis. 2d 65 - State Ex Rel. Watts v. Combined Community Services Board of Milwaukee County · 209 Wis. 2d 655 - Coutts v. Wisconsin Retirement Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The best interests of a ward and the ward's wishes expressed while competent may overlap. Ultimately, however, 'best interests' is a standard that is not necessarily coextensive with what an individual has chosen or would choose were she competent to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to assist persons interested in establishing non-court regimes for the management of their affairs in the event of later incompetence or disability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “whatever an agent does in the lawful prosecution of the transaction entrusted to him [or her] is the act of the principal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.