Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WI 28 - Lane v. SHARP PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.

Lane v. SHARP PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
7
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

2 district · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc. (2005), Sands v. Whitnall School District (2008)

2 district · 57 state decisions

270200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · United States v. Nobles · Clark v. United States · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub · United States v. Zolin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and using a demonstrative rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not intended to be disclosed to 3rd persons other than those to whom disclosure is in furtherance of the rendition of professional legal services to the client or those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'would directly or indirectly reveal the substance of the client's confidential communications to the lawyer,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.