State v. Samuel’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Arizona v. Fulminante · Malloy v. Hogan · Moran v. Burbine · Lego v. Twomey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether evidence should be suppressed is a question of constitutional fact. In reviewing questions of constitutional fact, we uphold a circuit court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous, but we independently determine whether those facts meet the constitutional standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Knapp“Whether evidence should be suppressed is a question of constitutional fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“presented only [conclusory] allegations,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Howell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.