Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WI 44 - State v. Jennings

State v. Jennings’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
6
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably State v. Knapp (2005), State v. Rogers (2009)

104 state decisions

480200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Edwards v. Arizona · Escobedo v. Illinois · Michigan v. Mosley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'articulate his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly that a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “a reasonable officer in light of the circumstances would have understood only that the suspect might be invoking the right to counsel,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[Wjhere the language of the provision in the state constitution is virtually identical to that of the federal provision or where no difference in intent is discernible, Wisconsin courts have normally construed the state constitution consistent with the United States Supreme Court's construction of the federal constitution.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.