State v. Schwebke’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Feiner v. People of State of New York · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 41 Wis. 2d 497 - State v. Zwicker · 139 Wis. 2d 397 - Bachowski v. Salamone · State v. Piddington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'First, [the State] must prove that the defendant engaged in violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, unreasonably loud, or similar disorderly conduct.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the circumstances in which the conduct occurred ... considering such factors as the location of the conduct, the parties involved and the manner of the conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Zoellick“First, the conduct must be of the type enumerated in the statute or similar thereto in having a tendency to disrupt good order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.