State v. Trochinski’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably State v. Brown (2006), State v. Hampton (2004)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. · 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · State v. Reppin · State v. Bollig · 96 Wis. 2d 646 - State v. Princess Cinema of Milwaukee, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that while an 'as applied' challenge to the constitutionality of a statute may be waived, a facial challenge is a matter of subject matter jurisdiction and cannot be waived.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Possession of child pornography, (lm) Whoever possesses any undeveloped film, photographic negative, photograph, motion picture, videotape, or other recording of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct under all of the following circumstances is guilty of a Class I felony: (a) The person knows that he or she possesses the material. (b) The person knows the character and content of the sexually explicit conduct in the material. (c) The person knows or reasonably should know that the child engaged in sexually explicit conduct has not attained the age of 18 years.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Schaefer · State v. Booker“A plea of no contest waives all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.