Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WI 62 - State v. Douangmala

State v. Douangmala’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
4
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably State v. Brown (2006), Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co. (2004)

47 state decisions

270200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 208 Wis. 2d 166 - In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. Cook · 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess · 175 Wis. 2d 684 - State v. Koch · 95 Wis. 2d 461 - Reiter v. Dyken · 117 Wis. 2d 359 - State v. Neave

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[N]or shall the . . . judgment . . . be affected by reason of any defect or imperfection in matters of form which do not prejudice the defendant.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If you are not a citizen of the United States of America, you are advised that a plea of guilty or no contest for the offense with which you are charged may result in deportation, the exclusion from admission to this country or the denial of naturalization, under federal law.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Address the defendant personally and advise the defendant as follows: "If you are not a citizen of the United States of America, you are advised that a plea of guilty or no contest for the offense with which you are charged may result in deportation, the exclusion from admission to this country or the denial of naturalization, under federal law."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.