State v. Robins’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
38 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2422 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act))
Relies on United States v. O'Brien · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. · Wisconsin v. Mitchell · Jay Fox v. State of Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“internet conversations and e-mails ... do not by themselves constitute the crime of child enticement. Rather, [the] internet conversation and e-mails are circumstantial evidence of his intent to entice a child ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[wjhoever, . . . causes or attempts to cause any child who has not attained the age of 18 years to go into any vehicle, building, room or secluded place is guilty of a Class BC felony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grimm · State v. Baron“That an act of child enticement is initiated or carried out in part by means of language does not make the child enticement statute susceptible of First Amendment serutiny.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.