Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WI 68 - State v. Green

State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
10
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Allen (2004), State v. Ndina (2009)

4 federal appellate · 59 state decisions — followed in 10 states

340200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Geders v. United States · Evans v. United States · 137 Wis. 2d 397 - Ford Motor Co. v. Lyons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “necessary to a determination of guilt or innocence”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he preliminary showing for an in camera review requires a defendant to set forth, in good faith, a specific factual basis demonstrating a reasonable likelihood that the records contain relevant information necessary to a determination of guilt or innocence and is not merely cumulative to other evidence available to the defendant. ... This test essentially requires the court to look at the existing evidence in light of the request and determine, as the Shiffra court did, whether the records will likely contain evidence that is independently probative to the defense.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hether the defendant 6 No. 2012AP150-CR submitted a preliminary evidentiary showing sufficient for an in camera review implicates a defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.