State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

cited by 28 later decisions

states following

January 2019

most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Broce · Menna v. New York · 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · 207 Wis. 2d 258 - State v. Smith · 219 Wis. 2d 615 - State Ex Rel. Warren v. Schwarz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“depends on the totality of the circumstances”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Krawczyk · 385 Wis. 2d 847 - State v. Bowser
“[W]e conclude that when the defendant repudiated the negotiated plea agreement on the ground that it contained multiplicitous counts, the defendant materially and substantially breached the plea agreement. We further conclude that when an accused successfully challenges a plea to and a conviction on one count of a two-count information on grounds of double jeopardy and the information has been amended pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement by which the State made charging concessions, ordinarily the remedy is to reverse the convictions and sentences, to vacate the plea agreement, and to reinstate the original information so that the parties are restored to their positions prior to the negotiated plea agreement. We also conclude, however, that under some circumstances this remedy might not be appropriate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Nelson · State v. Kelty
“We conclude that when an accused successfully challenges a plea to and conviction on one count of a two-count information on grounds of double jeopardy and the information has been amended pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement by which the State made charging concessions, ordinarily the remedy is to reverse the convictions and sentences, vacate the plea agreement, and reinstate the original information so that the parties are restored to their positions before the negotiated plea agreement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Krawczyk · 2007 WI App 193 - State v. Roou

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.