State v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · 113 Wis. 2d 61 - Sweet v. Berge · 117 Wis. 2d 701 - State v. Woods · 211 Wis. 2d 194 - State v. Klessig · 199 Wis. 2d 721 - State v. Cummings
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [provide] explicit warnings that, if the defendant persists in [specific conduct], the court will find that the right to counsel has been forfeited ...; (2) [engage in] a colloquy indicating that the defendant has been made aware of the difficulties and dangers inherent in self-representation; (3) [make] a clear ruling when the court deems the right to counsel to have been forfeited; and (4) [make] factual findings to support the court's ruling....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[F]orfeiture cannot occur simply because the effect of the defendant's conduct is to frustrate the orderly and efficient progression of the case. The defendant must also have the purpose of causing that effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A defendant may, by his or her conduct, forfeit the right to counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.