State v. Sveum’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Whalen v. United States · Alabama v. Smith · 160 Wis. 2d 722 - State v. Kuntz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before the violation of a harassment injunction may be found, the State must prove at least that: (1) an injunction was issued against the defendant under Wis. Stat. § 813.125 ; and (2) the defendant committed an act that violated the terms of the injunction.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“conduct which is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hauk“must be specific as to the acts and conduct which are enjoined.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.