Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WIAPP 106 - State v. Grindemann

State v. Grindemann’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Board (2017), State v. Crochiere (2004)

42 state decisions

220200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 107 Wis. 2d 400 - Loy v. Bunderson · 185 Wis. 2d 168 - State v. Escalona-Naranjo · 70 Wis. 2d 179 - Ocanas v. State · 70 Wis. 2d 280 - Rosado v. State · 207 Wis. 2d 258 - State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning what is right and proper under the circumstances.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]e will not set aside a discretionary ruling of the trial court if it appears from the record that the court applied the proper legal standards to the facts before it, and through a process of reasoning, reached a result which a reasonable judge could reach.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'We review a trial court's conclusion that a sentence it imposed was not unduly harsh and unconscionable for an erroneous exercise of discretion.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.