Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WI App 107 - State v. Rouse

2002 WI App 107 - State v. Rouse’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 37 Mass. App. Ct. 610 - VMark Software, Inc. v. EMC Corp. · 98 Wis. 2d 66 - Patrick v. Head of the Lakes Cooperative Electric Ass'n · Comdyne I, Inc. v. Corbin · AES Technology System, Inc. v. Coherent Radiation · 198 Wis. 2d 756 - State v. Schmaling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any case, the restitution order may require that the defendant do one or more of the following: (a) Pay all special damages, but not general damages, substantiated by evidence in the record, which could be recovered in a civil action against the defendant for his or her conduct in the commission of a crime considered at sentencing. (b) Pay an amount equal to the income lost, and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred, by the person against whom a crime considered at sentencing was committed resulting from the filing of charges or cooperating in the investigation and prosecution of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hile the bank's employees were investigating Rouse's forgeries, they were prevented from doing other work for the bank, and thus the bank lost all value of their services during that time .... The deprivation of an employee's productivity is a loss in itself that may or may not have an end result of lost profits. Requiring such a showing could deprive entities that do not work for profit any compensation for their lost resources. Further, it is reasonable to compensate an employer for this loss with the amount that it paid the employees during the time they were diverted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'those representing the victim's actual pecuniary losses' as opposed to general damages, which are those 'not readily susceptible to direct proof or easily estimable,' and include pain and suffering and injury to reputation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.