State v. Davison’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2003
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 217 Wis. 2d 392 - State v. Lechner · 93 Wis. 2d 287 - MacK v. State · 219 Wis. 2d 739 - State v. Anderson · 207 Wis. 2d 54 - State v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Consequently, since the enhancer is the status of the actor in § 940.20 and not the degree of the crime, there is not an ambiguity problem between the statutes with regard to the word 'battery.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davison“[a] crime which is [an] . . . equally serious type of battery than the one charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.