State v. Long’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Abel · 227 Wis. 2d 167 - State v. Watson · 84 Wis. 2d 370 - State v. Williamson · 167 Wis. 2d 247 - State v. Whitaker · 69 Wis. 2d 337 - Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[flor a witness's gang affiliation to be relevant to show bias in favor of [the defendant], the State was required to establish [the defendant's gang affiliation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the relationship between a party and a witness which might lead the witness to slant, unconsciously or otherwise, his testimony in favor of or against a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.