State v. Norfleet’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2003
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 108 Wis. 2d 112 - State v. Outlaw · 141 Wis. 2d 412 - State v. Larsen · Becker Electric, Inc. v. City of Bismarck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Identity of informer. (1) Rule of Privilege. The federal government or a state or subdivision thereof has a privilege to refuse to disclose the identity of a person who has furnished information relating to or assisting in an investigation of a possible violation of law to a law enforcement officer or member of a legislative committee or its staff conducting an investigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vanmanivong“Discretion is not synonymous with decision-making. Rathei the term contemplates a process of reasoning. This process must depend on facts that are of record or that are reasonably derived by inference from the record and a conclusion based on a logical rationale founded upon proper legal standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vanmanivong“the reality that informers are an important aspect of law enforcement and that the anonymity of informers is necessary for their effective use.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vanmanivong
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.