2002 WI App 145 - State v. Opalewski’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohler v. United States · 216 Wis. 2d 768 - State v. Sullivan · 160 Wis. 2d 722 - State v. Kuntz · 108 Wis. 2d 723 - State v. Alsteen · State v. Davidson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unfair prejudice arises either when the evidence admitted has a tendency to influence the outcome of the jury deliberations by the use of improper means, or when it arouses in the jury a sense of horror or desire to punish.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The required degree of similarity between the other act and the charged offense and the required number of similar other acts cannot be formulated as a general rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.