Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WIAPP 150 - State v. Miller

State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Place · United States v. Jacobsen · Almeida-Sanchez v. United States · Kyllo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “use of a drug-sniffing dog to detect the presence of marijuana inside Miller's car violated her rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the dog is trained in narcotics detection and has demonstrated a sufficient level of reliability in detecting drugs in the past and the officer with the dog is familiar with how it reacted when it smelled contraband.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether police conduct constitutes a 'search' within the meaning of the [Wisconsin Constitution] is a question of law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.