Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WIAPP 154 - State v. Helm

State v. Helm’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Bozza v. United States · 211 Wis. 2d 194 - State v. Klessig · 121 Wis. 2d 670 - State v. Martin · 208 Wis. 2d 142 - State v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “based upon objective information concerning identifiable conduct on the part of the defendant occurring after the time of the original sentencing proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.