2002 WI App 166 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2020
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 201 Wis. 2d 337 - State v. Petty · 175 Wis. 2d 600 - State v. SHIFFRS · State v. Shiffra · 203 Wis. 2d 43 - State v. Behnke · 198 Wis. 2d 756 - State v. Schmaling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Circuit courts have discretion ... in determining whether the defendant's criminal activity was a substantial factor in causing any expenses for which restitution is claimed.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“there must be a showing that the defendant's criminal activity was a substantial factor in causing”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(5) In any case, the restitution order may require that the defendant do one or more of the following: (a) Pay all special damages, but not general damages, substantiated by evidence in the record, which could be recovered in a civil action against the defendant for his or her conduct in the commission of a crime considered at sentencing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.