State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably 361 Wis. 2d 529 - State v. Joel M. Hurley (2015), State v. DeLain (2005)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 155 Wis. 2d 633 - State v. Pulizzano · 90 Wis. 2d 438 - Meurer v. ITT General Controls · 113 Wis. 2d 582 - State v. Lomagro · 145 Wis. 2d 244 - State v. Fawcett · 40 Wis. 2d 95 - Holesome v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“address the problem of dimmed memories and the possibility that the defendant may not be able to sufficiently recall or reconstruct the history regarding the allegations.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he credibility of witnesses and the assignment of weight afforded to witness testimony are left to the province of the jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“represent the most compelling factor[s] in explaining [L.T.'s] delay in reporting.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.