State v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Taylor v. United States · 175 Wis. 2d 684 - State v. Koch · 90 Wis. 2d 528 - State Ex Rel. Skinkis v. Treffert · State v. Hansen · 188 Wis. 2d 333 - Geiger v. Milwaukee Guardian Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conduct which is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or imprisonment or both,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[c]onvicted of a crime elsewhere that would be a felony if committed in this state”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Perhaps the State can prove conduct by showing that all the elements of a Wisconsin felony are included in the elements of an out-of-state crime, and that the other state's judiciary has interpreted the elements of the out-of-state crime in a way which would make that conduct a Wisconsin felony. This issue is not present, here, however, and we do not address it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.