State v. Grimm’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 52 Wis. 2d 791 - State v. Haugen · State v. Robins · 85 Wis. 2d 620 - Lhost v. State · 202 Wis. 2d 21 - State v. Smith · 218 Wis. 2d 61 - State v. Briggs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An attempt to commit a crime requires that the actor have an intent to perform acts and attain a result which, if accomplished, would constitute such crime and that the actor does acts toward the commission of the crime which demonstrate unequivocally, under all the circumstances, that the actor formed that intent and would commit the crime except for the intervention of another person or some other extraneous factor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brienzo“Robins makes it clear that going to meet at the planned time and place is a sufficient unequivocal act in furtherance of the criminal objective of child enticement, when earlier conversations provide reasonable inferences of that criminal objective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.