Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WIAPP 250 - State v. Joyner

State v. Joyner’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2023

16 state decisions

100200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williamson v. United States · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 153 Wis. 2d 121 - State v. Johnson · 124 Wis. 2d 681 - State v. Wyss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n assessing whether Williams's statements "so far" tended to subject him to criminal liability or to make him "an object of hatred, ridicule, or disgrace," that a reasonable person in Williams's position "would not have made the statement unless the person believed it to be true," WIS. STAT. § 908.045(4), this [c]ourt therefore should consider whether the circumstances were such that Williams was unlikely to lie, whether fear of punishment or easy detection of lies probably would have counteracted any motive to lie, and how public the statement was.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] trial court's decision to admit a hearsay statement is a discretionary one, and we will not reverse the trial court's decision unless the record shows that the ruling was manifestly wrong and an erroneous exercise of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The exception for statements against interest is based on the assumption that people do not make statements that are damaging to themselves unless they have a good reason to believe that those statements are true.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.