State v. Pozo’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pettit · 185 Wis. 2d 168 - State v. Escalona-Naranjo · 102 Wis. 2d 305 - Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc. · 132 Wis. 2d 266 - State Ex Rel. McMillian v. Dickey · 163 Wis. 2d 985 - State v. Witkowski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because it is an extraordinary writ, habeas corpus relief is available only where the petitioner demonstrates: (1) a restraint of his or her liberty, (2) which restraint was imposed contrary to constitutional protections or by a body lacking jurisdiction and (3) no other adequate remedy available at law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'a petition for writ of habeas corpus will not be granted where ... the petitioner asserts a claim that he or she could have raised during a prior appeal, but failed to do so, and offers no valid reason to excuse such failure.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a writ will not be issued where the 'petitioner has an otherwise adequate remedy 19 U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 2; Wis. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 2. 19 No. 2013AP1724.akz that he or she may exercise to obtain the same relief.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.