2002 WI App 28 - State v. Herman’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 23 U.S.C. § 104 · 23 U.S.C. § 159
Relies on 211 Wis. 2d 397 - State v. Setagord · 82 Wis. 2d 565 - Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service Commission · 181 Wis. 2d 815 - Awve v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc. · 186 Wis. 2d 300 - Clark v. WAUPACA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT · 166 Wis. 2d 930 - In RE MARRIAGE OF KERKVLIET v. Kerkvliet
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may be rendered ambiguous by the context in which it is sought to be applied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.