State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · 201 Wis. 2d 303 - State v. Bentley · 43 Wis. 2d 661 - Ernst v. State · State v. Bollig · 154 Wis. 2d 116 - State v. McQuay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“¶ 10. The questionnaire was dated December 6, 1998. Two days later, at the plea hearing, Hampton acknowledged that his counsel had read the information in the plea questionnaire to him and that Hampton had signed both sides of the form. ¶ 11. The plea hearing on December 8 generated a 28-page transcript, with a lengthy plea colloquy, which the court of appeals later described as”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hampton“I understand that the Judge is not bound to follow any plea agreement or any recommendation made by the District Attorney, my attorney, or any presentence report. I understand that the Judge is free to sentence me to the . . . maximum possible penalties in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hampton“I have read (or have had read to me) this entire questionnaire, and I understand its contents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hampton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.