State v. Thornton’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Anders v. California · Douglas v. People of State of California · McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1 · 92 Wis. 2d 797 - State v. MacHner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the dangers and disadvantages of proceeding pro se”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“). 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. Wisconsin Stat. Rules 809.30 and 809.32 have been revised since postconviction counsel in this case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Rule 809.30(4), or other law, requires that a motion to withdraw be filed any time an attorney appointed by the [SPD] terminates his or her postconviction/appellate representation of a defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.