Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WIAPP 53 - State v. Gordon

State v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wainwright v. Sykes · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Jones v. Barnes · United States v. Gaudin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To establish prejudice he `must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] defense attorney may not admit his client's guilt, which is contrary to his client's plea of not guilty, unless the defendant unequivocally understands and consents to the admission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “obviously running around the neighborhood with two knives is disorderly conduct and it is disorderly conduct while armed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.