2002 WI App 55 - State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 92 Wis. 2d 797 - State v. MacHner · 150 Wis. 2d 688 - State v. Blalock · 185 Wis. 2d 220 - Stern v. Thompson & Coates, Ltd. · 227 Wis. 2d 700 - State v. Faucher · 219 Wis. 2d 481 - State v. Ferron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. (emphasis omitted). Trial counsel did not ask any follow-up questions, nor did counsel seek to remove the prospective juror by any means. Id., ¶ 4. Ultimately, the juror served on the panel and the defendant was convicted. Id. We concluded that the defendant was entitled to a new trial because the juror's response”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tobatto“Do you feel that that would influence or affect your ability to be fair and impartial in this case?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tobatto
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.