2002 WI App 61 - State v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Bell v. Wolfish · Florida v. Royer · Whren v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cases stand for the proposition that the exclusionary rule is applicable in civil and criminal proceedings only where the evidence sought to be excluded was obtained in violation of a constitutional right or a statute that specifically requires suppression of wrongfully or illegally obtained evidence as a sanction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Popenhagen“custody is one factor to be considered in determining voluntariness, [but] it is not in itself disposi-tive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“free, intelligent, unequivocal and specific consent without any duress or coercion, actual or implied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.