Wilkie v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2021
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. United States · United States v. Taylor · Baker v. Kaiser · Vargas v. State · Taylor v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution requires that a defendant in state court shall have the right to represent himself if the accused himself timely, knowingly, and intelligently requests the right to forgo counsel, and does not do so to cause delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Large v. State“a reviewing court should indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schaeffer v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.