Joyner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2022
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Sandstrom v. Montana · McGuire v. McGuire · State v. Brown · Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Ass'n v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“involves the obligation of a party to present, at the appropriate time, evidence of sufficient substance on the issue involved to permit the fact finder to act upon it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[oJther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond 'a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Spinner v. State · Brown v. State“Both the United States and Wyoming constitutions provide that no person may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1; Wyo. Const. art. 1, § 6. To be constitutionally valid, the court issuing the order must have acted in a manner consistent with due process. Due process requires that the litigants be afforded both notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard. Murray v. Murray, 894 P.2d 607, 608 (Wyo.1995) (citing Sandstrom v. Sandstrom, 880 P.2d 103, 106 (Wyo.1994)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Patterson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.