Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 WY 68 - Young v. State

Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Manes v. State (2007), Kinstler v. RTB SOUTH GREELEY, LTD. LLC (2007)

26 state decisions

140200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Renfro v. State · Hodgins v. State · Milladge v. State · Smith v. State · White v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “pro se litigant is entitled to some leniency from the stringent standards applied to formal pleadings drafted by attorneys,”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The district court’s decision is given considerable deference unless a rational basis does not exist for it. A criminal defendant is entitled to receive credit against his sentence for the time he was incarcerated prior to sentencing, provided that such confinement was because of his inability and failure to post bond on the offense for which he was awaiting disposition. A sentence, which does not include credit for presentence incarceration, is illegal and constitutes an abuse of discretion. A defendant is not, however, entitled to credit for the time he spent in custody when that confinement would have continued despite his ability to post bond.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.