Pope v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2025
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Distajo v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. · Vigil v. State · Mueller v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under the facts of this case, it is clear that the charges involved two distinct actions against two different victims. Pope could be prosecuted for each of these incidents without violating his constitutignal right to be free from bemg placed twice in jeopardy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“misdemeanor interference with a peace officer is a lesser-included offense of the greater charge of felony interference with a peace officer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.