Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 ME 70 - State v. Shepley

State v. Shepley’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2024

10 state decisions

50200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp. · State v. Millett · State v. Heald · State v. Vainio · State v. Hardy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he rule of strict construction of a penal law is subordinate to this other rule, that the judicial interpretation must be reasonable and sensible, with a view to effectuating the legislative design, and the true intent of the Legislature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.