Wentworth v. Sebra’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
1 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Curtis v. Porter · Stickney v. City of Saco · LeMay v. Anderson · Brown v. Dickey · Hall v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person claiming an interest in real estate by reason of the omission of technical words of inheritance or the lack of an habendum clause in a deed that conveyed or reserved a property interest before October 7, 1967 may preserve that claim by commencing a civil action for the recovery of that property in the Superior Court or the District Court in the county or division in which the property is located on or before December 31, 2002.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the extent of the interest being granted and any conditions affecting the grant.” Wentworth v. Sebra, 2003 ME 97 , ¶ 19 n. 9, 829 A.2d 520 . The”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.