Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 MT 105 - State v. Saxton

State v. Saxton’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably State v. Gomez (2007), State v. Bobby Cooksey (2012)

28 state decisions

160200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · California v. Trombetta · United States v. McConney · State v. Rushton · State v. Duffy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the factual circumstances determined by a district court constitute exigent circumstances is a conclusion of law reviewed for correctness. State v. Saxton, 2003 MT 105, ¶ 19 , 315 Mont. 315, ¶ 19 , 68 P.3d 721, ¶ 19 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must be vital to the defense . . . the defense must show the evidence was material and of substantial use”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.