Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 MT 159 - State v. Turnsplenty

State v. Turnsplenty’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
2
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State v. Kougl (2004), State v. Hendricks (2003)

61 state decisions

370200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. White · State v. Herrman · State v. Harris · State v. Chastain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “counsel's performance was deficient or fell below an objective standard of reasonableness”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]t is a mistake to assume that we can determine from a cold record whether there was a tactical reason for not exercising a challenge. The reasons for counsel’s actions or inactions should not be “assumed” but should be the subject of a postconviction evidentiary inquiry. For the above-stated reasons, we overrule Chastain’s holding that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to challenge prospective jurors in voir dire can be determined from a record which is silent as to the lawyer’s reasoning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.