State v. Notti’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
8
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Reesman · State v. Rodgers · 132 Md. App. 510 - Wilson v. State · Washington v. State · 227 Ga. App. 413 - Bickley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] defendant's privacy interest in blood samples or blood profiles is lost when the defendant consents to a blood draw or where it has been obtained through proper judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Privacy concerns are no longer relevant once the sample has already lawfully been removed from the body....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.