Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 MT 179 - State v. Vandersloot

State v. Vandersloot’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hulse v. State, Department of Justice · State v. Flack · State v. Martin · State v. Clark · In Re the Seizure of $23,691.00 in United States Currency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The exception created by Rule 403, M.R.Evid., for the exclusion of relevant evidence due to its prejudicial or potentially misleading impact on the jury, does not embrace competent eyewitness testimony describing the commission of the offense for which the defendant is on trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Requiring a defendant to specifically raise the objection at trial gives the prosecution and trial court an opportunity to avoid or correct the purported error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.