Schaff v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2023
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Wright · State v. Hagen · State v. Schaff · State v. Schaff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“establish prejudice by demonstrating that there was a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, the result of the proceedings would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Santoro“range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Santoro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.