Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 MT 348 - State v. Rinkenbach

State v. Rinkenbach’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Daniels · State v. Pritchett · State v. Hendricks · State v. Sigler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may result in a manifest miscarriage of justice, may leave unsettled the question of the fundamental fairness of the 38 trial or proceedings, or may compromise the integrity of the judicial process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.