Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 MT 73 - Cimmaron Corp. v. Smith

Cimmaron Corp. v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably King v. American Family Mutual Insurance (2011), Grizzly Security Armored Express, Inc. v. Armored Group, LLC (2011)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

140200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Bi-Lo Foods, Inc. v. Alpine Bank, Clifton · Edsall Const. Co., Inc. v. Robinson · Threlkeld v. Colorado · Bird v. Hiller · Seal v. Hart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All persons found within the state of Montana are subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state. In addition, any person is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state as to any claim for relief arising from the doing personally, through an employee, or through an agent, of any of the following acts: (a) the transaction of any business within this state; (b) the commission of any act which results in accrual within this state of a tort action; (c) the ownership, use or possession of any property, or of any interest therein, situated within this state; (d) contracting to insure any person, property or risk located within this state at the time of contracting; (e) entering into a contract for services to be rendered or for materials to be furnished in this state by such person; or”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice embodied in the due process clause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.