Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 ND 110 - Tarnavsky v. Tarnavsky

Tarnavsky v. Tarnavsky’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2024

11 state decisions

90200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Napoleon Livestock Auction, Inc. v. Rohrich · Helling v. American State Bank & Trust Co. · Gangl v. Gangl · Tarnavsky v. Tarnavsky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, the association of two or more persons to carry on as coowners a business for profit forms a partnership, whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership. 2. An association formed under a statute- other than chapters 45-13 through 45-21, a predecessor statute, or a comparable statute of another jurisdiction is not a partnership under chapters 45-13 through 45-21. 3. In determining whether a partnership is formed, the following rules apply: a. Joint tenancy, tenancy in common, tenancy by the entireties, joint property, common property, or part ownership does not by itself establish a partnership, even if the coowners share profits made by the use of the property. b. The sharing of gross returns does not by itself establish a partnership, even if the persons sharing them have a joint or common right or interest in property from which the returns are derived, c. A person who receives a share of the profits of a business is presumed to be a partner in the business, unless the profits were received in payment: (1) Of a debt by installments or otherwise; . (2) For services as an independent contractor or of wages or 'other compensation to an employee; (3) Of rent; (4) Of an annuity or other retirement benefit to a beneficiary, representative, or designee of a deceased or retired partner; (5) Of interest or other charge on a loan, even if the amount of payment varies with the profits of the business, including a direct or indi”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When a party, by that party’s own declaration, act, or omission, intentionally and deliberately has led another to believe a particular thing true and to act upon such belief, that party shall not be permitted to falsify it in any litigation arising out of such declaration, act, or omission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The existence of a partnership is a mixed question of law and fact, and the ultimate determination of whether a partnership exists is a question of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.